Fruitcake, troll thyself

A woman in the UK has become the first person jailed for trolling herself.

Michelle Chapman, who used fake Facebook profiles to send herself hundreds of abusive messages, has been jailed for 20 months. Chapman created fake accounts that she used to send abusive messages to herself in order to frame her stepmother. Initially, authorities were suspicious of the stepmother because of the abusive nature of the messages, but a little bit of internet investigation revealed that Chapman had set up the accounts and used them to send abusive messages to herself.

Subsequently, Chapman is thought to be mentally ill.

Ya THINK?

Too bad there’s no jail time for someone creating dozens of accounts to blow smoke up their own ass. I can think of one or two mentally ill wingnuts that would go up the river for life.

Chapman has been given a restraining order and her computer was confiscated.

Oh, if ONLY!

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “Fruitcake, troll thyself

      • Its basically the same thing the two dumbasses are doing. Where we share actual facts about what we know they are simply just running their mouths in hoping that it shuts us up. Without a disclaimer for satyre on the blog they can get in serious federal trouble if they can’t back up alleged claims with fabricating them.

      • I’m thinking more along the lines of Facebook terms of use, which state that people aren’t supposed to make up fake names. The feds aren’t likely to do anything about some fruitcake talking to herself online without any (real or implied) abuse or terrorist threats. But I wonder what FB would have to say about one person creating dozens upon dozens of fake profiles and using them to talk to herself. Hmmm…

    • Too be there’s no penalty for being a fruitcake with nothing better to do than make up fake names to talk to themselves. Sad and pathetic as it is, there’s no law against being an intellectually stunted idiot with delusions spanning multiple personalities.

  1. Facebook terms of service include:
    Registration and Account Security
    Facebook users provide their real names and information, and we need your help to keep it that way. Here are some commitments you make to us relating to registering and maintaining the security of your account:
    1. You will not provide any false personal information on Facebook, or create an account for anyone other than yourself without permission.
    2. You will not create more than one personal account.
    3. If we disable your account, you will not create another one without our permission.
    4. You will not use your personal timeline primarily for your own commercial gain, and will use a Facebook Page for such purposes.
    5. You will not use Facebook if you are under 13.
    6. You will not use Facebook if you are a convicted sex offender.
    7. You will keep your contact information accurate and up-to-date.
    8. You will not share your password (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.
    9. You will not transfer your account (including any Page or application you administer) to anyone without first getting our written permission.
    10. If you select a username or similar identifier for your account or Page, we reserve the right to remove or reclaim it if we believe it is appropriate (such as when a trademark owner complains about a username that does not closely relate to a user’s actual name).

    Who do we know that’s violated just about every single one of these terms?

      • More than that, she’s caused most, if not all, of her authors to do the same by encouraging them to create or assume one of her patented aliases. That’s compromising not only to their reputation, but also threatens their online presences. Each and every one of them that takes part in those shady activities stands to lose their accounts. She just doesn’t care who she ruins.

        Anybody here ever create or adopt an alt at her behest?

        Still think she’s got your best interests at heart?

  2. My brain is exhausted but.. was the original fruitcake in the article granted a restraining order.. from herself? Because that would be awesome. “The Defendant must remain 100 yards away from herself.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s